Modern Technology within the Western Theological Imaginary

Neil Turnbull

Abstract


In this paper, I claim that modern technology possesses certain general ‘onto-formative’ characteristics that indicate that our contemporary technological condition now defies orthodox theoretical forms of comprehension. In the light of this claim, I will propose that any adequate conceptual understanding of modern technics requires a decisive shift of disciplinary register: specifically, towards theology and to the formation of new philosophical paradigms founded upon metaphysically-inspired interpretations of the ‘total significance’ of modern technics. Such theological conceptions, I will argue, emerge from a startling recognition of modern technics’ incipient association with the infinite, the transcendent as well as with its capacity to “bring new worlds into existence”. I attempt this, in the first instance, by drawing upon the work of two major thinkers who I believe paved the way towards just such a theological conception: Martin Heidegger and Ernst Jünger. In a non-standard interpretation of their respective philosophies of technology, I will go on to claim that these two thinkers should be viewed as attempting to find a way towards a “radically conservative” revalorisation of ancient theological truths that they believed could provide 20th century modernity with the philosophical groundwork for a new techno-political order that they posited in contrast to a dying Platonic-Christian civilisation. For both of these thinkers a theological understanding of modern technics created the possibility of a new spiritual condition/zeitgeist where the very idea of modern technology is rearticulated as the focal point of a post-Platonic-Christian social imaginary that they believed to be revolutionary in its necessarily destructive relationship to extant historical worlds and their corresponding traditions. By these lights, I suggest, that modern social imaginary can only be con conceived within a new theological synthesis that transcends the Platonic/Christian dichotomy of techne and theoria - of the worker and the philosopher/priest - in a way that allows for the poetic root of both to be revealed in its primal, world-constituting, form. I will conclude with a brief comparison between these ‘pagan’ conceptions of technology and contemporary Christian theological conceptions which have been acutely aware of the highly ambiguous position of modern technics within Christian metaphysical schemes and the need to reform these in the light the manifestly destructive potential of modern forms of technological innovation.

Keywords


Technics; modernity; theology; radical conservatism; Christianity; Platonism; myth

Full Text:

PDF

References



Benjamin, W. (1992), The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In Illuminations London: Fontana.
Castells, M. (2000), Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society in The British Journal of Sociology 51, 1: 5-24.
Colacurcio, M. (1965), The Dynamo and the Angelic Doctor: The Basis of Henry Adams’ Medievalism. In American Quarterly 7, 4: 696-712.
Dahl, G. (1996), Radical Conservatism and the Future of Politics. London: Sage.
Ellul, Jacques (1964), The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books.
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2001), Empire. Cambridge Ma: Harvard University Press. Heidegger, M. (1977), The Age of the World Picture. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, New York: Harper-Row.
Heidegger, M. (1978), The Question Concerning Technology. In Farrell Krell, David (ed.) Basic Writings: Martin Heidegger, London: Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (1996a), Hölderlin’s Hymn The ‘Ister’. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Heidegger, M. (1996b), The Principle of Reason. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Jünger, E. (1983a), Technology and the Gestalt of the Worker. In Mitcham, C. and Mackey. R. (eds.) Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology, New York: Free Press.
Jünger, E. (1983b), Aladdin’s Problem. New York: Quartet Books.
Jünger, E. (1993a), Eumeswil. London: Quartet Books.
Jünger, E. (1993b), On Danger. New German Critique, Special Issue on Ernst Jünger, 59: 27- 32.
Jünger, E. (2000), The Glass Bees. New York: New York Review of Books.
Jünger, E. (2013), The Forest Passage. New York: Telos Press.
Kittler, W. (2008), From Gestalt to Gestell: Martin Heidegger Reads Ernst Jünger. Cultural Critique, 69: 79-97
Meyer, M. (1983), The Parable of Aladdin’s Problem. In Jünger, E. Aladdin’s Problem, New York: Quartet.
Mitcham, C. (1994), Thinking through Technology. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Rabinow, P. (1996), Essays in the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Romanyshyn, R. D. (1989), Technology as Symptom and Dream. London: Routledge. Simondon, G. (2012), Technical Mentality. In De Boever et. al. (eds.), Gilbert Simondon: Being and Technology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1-15.
Stiegler, B. (1994), Technics and Time: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Taylor, C. (2007), The Secular Age. Cambridge Ma: Belknap.
Toscano, A. (2007), European Nihilism and Beyond. In Badiou, A. (ed.) The Century Cambridge: Polity.
Turnbull, N. (2006), The Ontological Consequences of Copernicus: Global Being in the Planetary World. Theory, Culture and Society, 23: 125-39.
Turnbull, N. (2009) Heidegger and Jünger on the Significance of Century: Technology as a Theme in Conservative Thought. Writing Technologies, 2(2): 9-34.
Turnbull, N. (2015), Light and Illumination: Paul Virilio’s Neo-Platonism and the Theological Critique of Modernity. Cultural Politics, 11(2): 260-74.
White, L. Jr. (1977), The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis. In Mitcham, C. and Mackey, R. (eds.), Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problem of Technology. New York: Free Press.
Wood, D. (2002), Thinking after Heidegger. Cambridge: Polity
Zimmerman, M. (1990), Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity. Indianapolis: Indian University Press




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7413/22818138044

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary - Biannual - Edizioni Mimesis