The Irrelevant Sound Effect: Testing the Psychological Effects of Sequence Predictability

Alessandro Antonietti, Tindara Caprì, Rosa Angela Fabio, George Stuart, Giulia Towey, Annamaria Pugliese, Gabriella Martino

Abstract


We tested the hypothesis that expectancy-violation is key to understanding those conditions under which instrumental music disrupts immediate serial-recall. Using isochronic presentation of irrelevant-sound stimuli during encoding and retention, recall was found to be impaired following both piano-note sequences (Experiment 1) and pure-tone sequences (Experiment 2). However, whereas intervallic organisation was determinant for pure-tones (randomly-ordered frequencies caused recall impairment while repeated frequency or ascending-frequency sequences did not) there was no effect of intervallic organisation of piano-note sequences. When the to-be-ignored sequences were presented with random anisochrony, the disruptive effect was absent for both piano notes (Experiment 3) and pure tones (Experiment 4). It is proposed that the irrelevant sound effect can be explained in terms of stimulus specific expectancy violation.


Keywords


ound effect; Psychological effects of sequence predictability; violation of expectancy; memory performance in music

Full Text:

PDF

References


1.Jones, D. M. (1999). The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: the 1997 Broadbent lecture. Brit J Psyc, 90, 167–187.

2. Elliott, E. M. (2002). The irrelevant speech effect and children: Theoretical implications of developmental change. Memory Cognit, 30, 478-487.

3.Hadlington, L. J., Bridges, A. M., & Darby, R. D. (2004). Auditory location in the irrelevant sound effect: The effects of presenting auditory stimuli to either the left ear, right ear or both ears. Brain Cognit, 55, 545-557.

4.Macken, W. Tremblay, S. Alford, D., & Jones, D. (1999). Attentional selectivity in short-term memory: Similarity of process, not similarity of content, determines disruption. Inter J Psych, 34, 322-327.

5. Tremblay, S., Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2001). The impact of broadband noise on serial memory: Changes in band-pass frequency increase disruption. Memory, 9, 323-331.

6. Boyle, R. & Coltheart, V. (1996). Effects of irrelevant sounds on phonological coding in reading comprehension and short-term memory, Qua J Experim Psyc, 49A, 398-416.

7. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.

8.Beaman, C.P., & Jones, D.M. (1997). The role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing state hypothesis. J Expe Psych: Learn, Mem Cognit, 23, 459-471.

9.Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., Houghton, R. J. Nicholls, A. P., & Jones, D. M. (2003). Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 43–51

10. Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. G. (2003). The irrelevant sound effect: What needs modelling, and a tentative model. Qua J Expe Psych, 56A, 1289-1300.

11.Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford Psychology Series, No.26. New York: Oxford University Press.

12. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psych Bul, 104, 163-191.

13. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. J Exp Psych: Learn, Mem Cognit, 19, 369-381.

14. Cuddy, L. L. & Lunney, C. A. (1995). Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: Perceptual judgments of melodic continuity. Perc Psych, 57, 451-462.

15.Steinbeis, N., Koelsch, S., & Sloboda, J. A. (2006). The role of harmonic expectancy violations in musical emotions: Evidence from subjective, physiological and neural responses. J Cognit Neurosc, 18, 1380-1393.

16.Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial

recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? J Expe Psych: Learn, Mem Cognit, 31, 736-749.

17.Tolan, G. A., & Tehan, G. (2002). Testing feature interaction: Between-stream irrelevant Speech effects in immediate recall. J Memo Lang, 46, 562-585.

18. LeCompte, D. C. (1996). Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: A new approach to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1154-1165.

19. Fabio, R.A., Mohammadhasni, N., Caprì, T., & Falzone, A. (2015). Valutazione dell'entropia tramite l'eye-tracking: influenza del carico cognitivo degli stimoli. In Origini, Immaginari, Etiche (pp.340-351). Corisco: Messina-Roma.

20. Fabio, R.A., Incorpora, C., Errante, A., Mohammadhasani, N., Caprì, T., Carrozza, C., De Santis S., & Falzone, A. (2015). The influence of cognitive load and amount of stimuli on entropy through eye tracking measures. In G. Airenti. Atti del Convegno Europeo AISC, EapCogScience




DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/1828-6550/APMB.106.1.2018.OS1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Alessandro Antonietti, Tindara Caprì, Rosa Angela Fabio, George Stuart, Giulia Towey, Annamaria Pugliese, Gabriella Martino

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.