Utilità e danno della “parte maledetta” nell’economia dell’immaginario

Simone Di Blasi

Abstract





About the utility and liability of the “accursed share” in the economy of imaginary. The “Evil” as excess, waste, total consumption; or “bad”, “accursed” because it destabilizes the current “state of affairs”. This essay is intended to expose the economic theory of G. Bataille by a short reading of The limit of utility and of The Accursed share, where he explains his theory of a “general economy” in opposition to what he called the “restricted economy”, corresponding to the whole of economic sciences. According to the fact that economics just study production/extraction, distribution and consumption of matters and goods by the narrow scope of the “isolated situation” of individualistic interest, he tries to go further beyond this classical perspective with a redefinition of the evaluation/exploitation process and the relation between useful and useless. In this way he discovers the paradox of prosperity, its curse: prosperity is “excess” (prodigality) but it’s always destined to became “waste” (squandering). Finally a reading back of Bataille’s insights it is carried out through a comparison with the analysis M. Anspack runs in his A charge de revanche, a book in which he outlines a wide overview of reciprocity in human relationships and in economic phenomena. 





Keywords


Sacrifice; Dépense; Gift; Autotrascendence; Economic general theory

Full Text:

PDF (Italiano)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary - Biannual - Edizioni Mimesis