Dalla Chickie-Run alla challenge di Casal Palocco: piattaforme, content creator e immaginari
Abstract
From the Chickie-Run to the Casal Palocco challenge. Platforms, content creators and imaginaries.
The controversies surrounding the fatal car accident in Casal Palocco have rekindled old criticisms regarding the use of social media by the younger generations. Philosophers and commentators have voiced their concerns in the face of the social, identity, and familial crisis caused by the success of social platforms. Technological dependency, digital narcissism, and the inability to discern the distinction between online and offline realities are purportedly transforming the younger generations into ‘monsters’ obsessed on likes. In this paper, we aim to examine the imaginaries that underlie the social narratives attempting to define influencers, youtubers, tiktokers, and the vast and heterogeneous cosmos of content creators populating the internet. The objective is to reconstruct the mythologies and rituals at play, endeavoring to bridge together media forms and socioeconomic practices. Simultaneously, however, the study intends to shed light on whether and to what extent this imaginary is fueled by the logic of platformization. We contend that the easy gains achieved by the very young by pushing the boundaries of challenges further and further are a determining variable that sustains the discussed imaginary
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abercrombie N., Longhurst B.J. (1998), Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination, London, Sage.
Allegri M.R. (2017), “Alcune considerazioni sulla responsabilità̀ degli intermediari digitali, e particolarmente dei social network providers, per i contenuti prodotti dagli utenti”, Informatica e diritto, 1-2: 89-112.
Andreola F., Ventura R.A. (2020), Disagiotopia. Malessere, precarietà ed esclusione nell’era del tardo capitalismo, Roma, D editore.
Astone A. (2021), “Il contrasto alla disinformazione online: le soluzioni normative già adottate e quelle prospettate”, Comparazione e diritto civile, 3: 897-921.
Bennato D. (2018), “L’emergere della disinformazione come processo socio-computazionale. Il caso Blue Whale”, Problemi dell'informazione, 3: 393-420.
Biltereyst D. (2007), “American Juvenile Delinquency Movies and the European Censors”, in Shary T., Seibel A. (eds.), Youth Culture In Global Cinema, Austin, University of Texas Press, 9-26.
Boccia Artieri G., García-Bilbao P.A., La Rocca G. (2021), “Rethinking affective polarization and sharing of emotions in digital platform ecosystems. Theories and research practices”, International Review of Sociology, 2: 223-230.
Centorrino M., Di Paola L. (2022), “L’opera d’arte nell’era della sua colonizzazione. I rischi del Metaverso”, Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary, 19: 195-209.
Centorrino M., Di Paola L., Condemi J., Ferrigno C. (2023), “Conoscere il metaverso: device, corpi, luoghi e relazioni”, Complessità, 1: 34-72.
Ciofalo G., Leonzi S. (2021), “Schermo, habitat, piattaforma. Metafore dell’immaginario della comunicazione”, H-ermes, J. Comm., 19: 7-30.
Colombo E., Leonini L. (2015), “Introduzione: giovani e crisi in Italia tra precarietà e incertezza”, Mondi Migranti, 2: 35-51.
Floridi L. (2014), The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, Oxford, Oxford Internet Institute.
Frezza G. (2013), Dissolvenze: mutazioni del cinema, Latina, Tunuè.
Hajdu D. (2010), Maledetti fumetti! come la grande paura per i" giornaletti" cambiò la società statunitense, Latina, Tunuè.
Hilton Z. (2021), Analisi di efficaci risposte educative per la prevenzione delle sfide online pericolose, Praesidio safeguarding. https://praesidiosafeguarding.co.uk/safe-guarding/uploads/2021/11/Exploring-effective-prevention-education-responses-to-dangerous-online-challenges-Italian-compressed.pdf?x70166
Jenkins H. (2006), Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers. Exploring Participatory Culture, New York, New York University Press.
Marzo P.L., Mori L. (2019), Le vie sociali dell’immaginario: Per una sociologia del profondo, Milano, Mimesis.
Morin E. [1962] (2002), Lo spirito del tempo, Roma, Meltemi.
Morozov E. (2014), Internet non salverà il mondo, Milano, Mondadori.
Morton J. (1986), “Juvenile Delinquency Film”, in Vale V., Juno A. (ed.), Incredibly strange films, 10: 143-146.
Neilson D. (2015), “Class, precarity, and anxiety under neoliberal global capitalism: From denial to resistance”, Theory & Psychology, 2: 184-201.
Pedemonte E. (2017), “Piattaforme digitali: la dittatura vorace che piace”, DigitCult, 3: 9-14.
Petruso R. (2019), La responsabilità degli intermediari della rete telematica I modelli statunitensi ed europei a confronto, Torino, Giappichelli.
Poell T., Nieborg D.B., Duffy, B.E. (2022), Piattaforme digitali e produzione culturale, Roma, Minimum Fax.
Purcell C., Garcia R. (2021), “Indecent Work? The Rise of Digital Platform Work in France and the United Kingdom”, Christie F., Antoniadou M., Albertson K., Crowder M. (eds.), Decent Work, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, 99-112.
Ragone G. (2015), “Radici della sociologia dell’immaginario”, Mediascapes journal, 4: 63-75.
Rota A. (2021), “I creatori di contenuti digitali sono lavoratori?”, Labour & Law Issues, 2: I-1.
Susca V. (2022), Tecnomagia: Estasi, totem e incantesimi nella cultura digitale, Milano, Mimesis.
Valerii M. (2017), “L’immaginario collettivo nell’era biomediatica”, DigitCult, 3: 1-8.
van Dijck J. (2013), The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
van Dijck J., Poell T., de Waal M. (2016), De platformsamenleving. Strijd om publieke warden in een onliner wereld, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7413/2281813819583
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary - Biannual - Edizioni Mimesis