La politica dell’intelligenza artificiale general purpose: immaginari socio-tecnici, democrazia e policy frame nel processo decisionale della regolazione europea (“EU AI ACT” - 2022-2024)
Abstract
The politics of general-purpose artificial intelligence: socio-technical imaginaries, democracy and policy frames in European regulatory decision-making ('EU AI ACT' - 2022-2024.
The article proposes a dialogue between different conceptualizations of 'imaginary' and 'socio-technical imaginaries' and an interpretive analysis perspective of political processes to understand European artificial intelligence (AI) policy. The object of analysis is the decision-making process of the “EU AI Act”, approved in spring 2024. The investigation is focused on General Purpose AI and its consequences for democracy. The operationalization of the concepts shed light on the relationships between meaning construction and material stakes in the negotiations between political and social actors. The imaginary of 'risk to democracy' and the category of 'systemic risk' helped to structure the policy frame of the EU AI Act. The imaginary thus plays a role at once cognitive and normative in sense-making processes and social practices such as a policy process, helping to structure relations between subsystems of society (economic, social, cultural, techno-scientific, academic, political).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Italiano)References
Adams, S., Blokker, P., Doyle, N. J., Krummel, J. W., & Smith, J. C. (2015). “Social imaginaries in debate”. Social Imaginaries, 1(1), 15-52.
AI4 People (2023) Letter to mr. Macron, mr. Schulz, ms. Meloni Ref. BB-LF 54-2023; ultimo accesso il 31 maggio 2024.
Algorithm Watch, (2023) Generative AI must be neither the stowaway nor the gravedigger of the AI Act - AlgorithmWatch ultimo accesso il 31 maggio 2024.
Arnason, P. J., (2014) “Social Imaginary Significations”, in Adams, S., (a cura di) Cornelius Castoriadis: Key concepts, Bloomsbury, London, pp. 23-42.
Arsenault A. C., Kreps S. E. (2022), “AI and International Politics”, in Bullock J. B. et al., (a cura di), The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance (online edn, Oxford Academic, 14 Feb).
Avalle, M., Di Marco, N., Etta, G. et al. (2024) “Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time”. Nature 628, 582–589.
Bareis, J., & Katzenbach, C. (2022). “Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics”. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(5), 855-881. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007.
Bächle, T.C., Bareis, J. (2022) “Autonomous weapons as a geopolitical signifier in a national power play: analysing AI imaginaries in Chinese and US military policies”. Eur J Futures Res 10, 20 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-022-00202-w.
Bakiner, O. (2023). “Pluralistic sociotechnical imaginaries in Artificial Intelligence (AI) law: the case of the European Union’s AI Act”. Law, Innovation and Technology, 15(2), 558-582.
Brause, S. R., Zeng, J., Schäfer, M. S., & Katzenbach, C. (2023) “Media representations of artificial intelligence: surveying the field”. In Lindgren, S. (a cura di) Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803928562.00030.
Browne, C., & Diehl, P. (2019). “Conceptualising the political imaginary: An introduction to the special issue”, in Social Epistemology, 33(5), 393-397.
Bullock, J. B. et al. (2022) “Introduction”, in Bullock J. B. et al., (a cura di.), The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance (online edition, Oxford Academic, 14 Feb).
Buec (2023) Eu risks under regulating generative AI, European Consumer Organisation https://www.beuc.eu/sites/default/files/publications/BEUC-PR-2023-025_Consumer_groups_call_on_regulators_to_investigate_generative_AI_risks_%26_enforce_existing_legislation.pdfultimo accesso il 31 maggio.
Castoriadis, C. 1987 [1975], The Imaginary Institution of Society, Blamey, K. (traduzione), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Castoriadis, C., (2007) Figures of the Thinkable , H. Arnold (traduzione), Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
Chan J, 2021, “The Future of AI in Policing: Exploring the sociotechnical imaginaries”, in McDaniel J; Pease K (a cura di), Predictive Policing and Artificial Intelligence, Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon.
Chuan, C. (2023). “A critical review of news framing of artificial intelligence”. In Lindgren S, (a cura di), Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803928562.00029.
Coeckelberg M. (2022), The political philosophy of AI, Polity.
Coeckelbergh M. (2023), “Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence”, AI Ethics, 3:1341–1350.
Council of Europe, (2022) General approach, 22 November; https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14954-2022-INIT/en/pdf.
Crouch C. (2004), Post-Democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Crouch C. (2020), Post-Democracy after the Crises, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Digital Watch Observatory, (2023) Germany, France, and Italy reach consensus on AI Act with mandatory self-regulation | Digital Watch Observatory, ultimo accesso il 31 maggio 2024.
Duberry J. (2022), Artificial Intelligence and Democracy. Risks and Promises of AI-Mediated Citizen–Government Relations, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service (2023), Artificial intelligence, democracy and elections.
European SME Alliance, (2023) Tiered based regulation of AI foundation models to support SME innovation - European DIGITAL SME Alliance, ultimo accesso il 31 maggio 2024.
European Parliament, Artificial Intelligence Act (2023) 14 giugno : Artificial Intelligence Act, ultimo accesso il 31 maggio 2024.
European Parliament and Council of Europe (2024) REGOLAMENTO DEL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO E DEL CONSIGLIO che stabilisce regole armonizzate sull'intelligenza artificiale e modifica i regolamenti (CE) n. 300/2008, (UE) n. 167/2013, (UE) n. 168/2013, (UE) 2018/858, (UE) 2018/1139 e (UE) 2019/2144 e le direttive 2014/90/UE, (UE) 2016/797 e (UE) 2020/1828 (regolamento sull'intelligenza artificiale) https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-24-2024-INIT/it/pdf
Floridi, L. (2021). “The end of an era: from self-regulation to hard law for the digital industry”. Philosophy and Technology, 619-622.
Future of Life Institute, (2022) General Purpose AI and the AI Act, ultimo accesso al 31 maggio 2024.
Future of Life Institute, (2023) Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter - Future of Life Institute, ultimo accesso al 31 maggio 2024.
Hansen, S. (2022). “Public AI imaginaries: How the debate on artificial intelligence was covered in Danish newspapers and magazines 1956–2021”. Nordicom Review, 43(1), 56-78.
Hautala, J., & Heino, H. (2023). “Spectrum of AI futures imaginaries by AI practitioners in Finland and Singapore: The unimagined speed of AI progress”. Futures, 153, 103247.
Hoff, L-J. (2023) “Unavoidable futures? How governments articulate sociotechnical imaginaries of AI and healthcare services”, Futures, Volume 148.
Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Polity.
Jungherr, A. (2023). “Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: A Conceptual Framework”. Social Media + Society, 9 (3) (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20563051231186353).
Katzenbach C.;Richter V.; Schäfer M.S. (2023) “Imaginaries of Artificial Intelligence”, in Lindgren, S. (a cura di) Handbook of Critical Studies on Artificial Intelligence, Edward Elgar Publishing.
König P.D., Wenzelburger, G., (2020), “Opportunity for renewal or disruptive force? How artificial intelligence alters democratic politics”, Government Information Quarterly, Volume 37, Issue 3.
Krarup, T., & Horst, M. (2023). “European artificial intelligence policy as digital single market making”. Big Data& Society,10(1), 1–14.
La Repubblica, 24 11 (2023) Perché il governo italiano sta dalla parte di chi non vuole regolamentare l'IA? - la Repubblica , ultimo accesso al 31 maggio 2024.
Mager A., Katzenbach, C., (2021) “Future imaginaries in the making and governing of digital technology: Multiple, contested, commodified, Introduction to the special issue, New Media & Society, 23 (2), pp. 223-236, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929321.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845.
Jasanoff, S., (2015) “One Future Imperfect: Science, Technology and the Imaginations of Modernity”, in Jasanoff, S., e Kim, S. H., (a cura di), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the fabrication of Power, University of Chicago Press, consultato in open access online il 27 maggio 2024 al link: Imaginaries – P. 1 Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity Sheila Jasanoff Techn
Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea”. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146.
Jasanoff, Sheila & Kim, Sang-Hyun. (2013). “Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies”. Science as Culture. 22. 189-196. 10.1080/09505431.2013.786990.
Jasanoff, Sheila & Kim, Sang-Hyun. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001.
Paltieli, G. (2022). “The political imaginary of National AI Strategies”. AI and Society. 37 (4):1613-1624.
Paltieli G. (2023), “Re-imagining democracy: AI’s challenge to political theory” in Lindgren, S. (a cura di), Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence, Edward Elgar.
Paul, R. (2024), “European artificial intelligence ‘trusted throughout the world’: Risk-based regulation and the fashioning of a competitive common AI market”. Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12563.
Rahm, L., & Rahm-Skågeby, J. (2023). “Imaginaries and problematizations: A heuristic lens in the age of artificial intelligence in education”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 1147–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13319.
Raniolo F., (2024), La partecipazione politica, Il mulino, Bologna
Rein M., Schön D. (1993) “Reframing Policy Discourse”, in F. Fischer e J. Forester J. (a cura di), The argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duhram and London: Duke University Press, 145-166.
Sanders CB; Chan J, (2023), “Methodological reflections on researching the sociotechnical imaginaries of AI in policing”, in Lindgren, S., (a cura di) Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 773 – 782.
Sartori, L., Bocca, G. (2023) “Minding the gap(s): public perceptions of AI and socio-technical imaginaries”. AI & Society 38, 443–458 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01422-1.
Shevlane, T., Farquhar, S. Garfinkel, B., Phuong, M., Whittlestone, J., Leung, L., Kokotajlo, D., Marchal, N., Anderljung, M., Kolt, N., Ho, L., Siddarth, D., Avin, Hawkins, S. W., Kim, B., Gabriel, J., Bolina, V., Clark, J., Bengio, J., Christiano, J. and Dafoe, A., (2023) Model evaluation for extreme risks, DeepMind, consultato 29 maggio 2024 al https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.15324
Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Resolving intractable policy issues. New York: Basic Books.
Stix, C. (2022) “The ghost of AI Governance. Past, Present and Future: AI Governance in the European Union. In J. Bullock et al., (a cura di) The Oxford Handbook of Ai Governance. New York: Oxford University Press(online edn, Oxford Academic, 14 Feb).
Sum, N.-L., & Jessop, B. (2013). Towards a cultural political economy. Putting culture in its place in political economy. EdwardElgar.
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries, Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpgvt.
Viehoff, J, (2022) “Beyond Justice: Artificial Intelligence and the Value of Community”, in Justin B. Bullock, et al., (a cura di), The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance (online edn, Oxford Academic, 14 Feb. 2022).
Wang, W., Downey, J., & Yang, F. (2023). “AI anxiety? Comparing the sociotechnical imaginaries of artificial intelligence in UK, Chinese and Indian newspapers.” Global Media and China, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231196547.
Wihbey J.P., (2024), “AI and Epistemic Risk for Democracy: A Coming Crisis of Public Knowledge?”, Conference on Democracy’s Mega Challenges: How Climate Change, Migration, and Big Data Threaten the Future of Liberal Democratic Governance, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, April 19-20
Wood M., Flinders M. (2014), “Rethinking Depoliticisation: Beyond the Governmental”, Policy & Politics, 42, 2, pp. 151-70
Zeng, J., Chung-Hong, C., Schäfer, M. S., (2022). “Contested Chinese dreams of AI? Public discourse about artificial intelligence on WeChat and people’s daily online”. Information, Communication and Society, 25(3):319-340.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7413/2281813819592
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary - Biannual - Edizioni Mimesis