AI in the Public Sector: An Exploration of Social Imaginaries
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) enables the transformation of both organizations and institutions alike in many different fields. This paper explores the social imaginaries (i.e. set of imagined and collectively shared ideas, practices, and values people use to construct and legitimize reality) in relation to the use of AI in the public sector. According to Castoriadis (1975), human imagination plays a key role in the process of the “self-generation” of the current social order. Indeed, technological affordances and social practices are intertwined and mutually shape each other, and both contribute to the generation of what is called the “social imaginary.” Through a discourse analysis, the paper investigates the most popular narratives in European and Italian public policies framing and regulating the implementation of AI in the public sector. Then, the paper explores the AI imaginaries of Italian public sector through 15 interviews with AI experts (i.e., designers and managers) from the Italian public sector. Differences and similarities in the AI social imaginaries between policies and experts are highlighted. Experts advocate the need for a human-centered design approach in the implementation of AI to map users’ needs and to design useful public services. By adopting Castoriadis’ (1975) approach, we identify opposition between the heteronomous imagination, the one imposed by public policies, and the autonomous imagination, based on citizens’ needs and perceptions, including emotional ones. In conclusion, the paper calls for a human-centered design approach in the implementation of AI in the public sector.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agarwal, P. K. (2018), “Public Administration Challenges in the World of AI and Bots”, Public Administration Review, vol. 78, n. 6: 917-921
AgID (2018), Libro Bianco sull’Intelligenza Artificiale al Servizio del Cittadino
AgID (2023), Piano Triennale per l’Informatica nella Pubblica Amministrazione. Edizione 2024-2026
Auernhammer J. (2020), “Human-Centered AI: the Role of Human-Centered Design Research in the Development of AI”, in Boess S., Cheung M. and Cain R. (eds.), Synergy - DRS International Conference 2020
Barone A. (2020), “Amministrazione del rischio e intelligenza artificiale”, in European Review of Digital Administration & Law - Erdal, vol. 1, n. 1-2: 63-67
Bellini V., Biancofiore G.M., Di Noia T., Sciascio E. D., Narducci F., Pomo C. (2020), GUapp: A Conversational Agent for Job Recommendation for the Italian Public Administration, IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS) 2020
Bory S., Bory P. (2016), “New Imaginaries of the Artificial Intelligence”, Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary, vol. 4, n.6: 66–85
Castoriadis C. (1975), L’Institution Imaginaire de la Société, Paris, Seuil.
Cavallo Perin R. (2021), “L’amministrazione pubblica con i big data: da Torino un dibattito sull’intelligenza artificiale”, in Quaderni del Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Torino, Torino,
Centorrino M., Di Paola L. (2022), “L’opera d’arte nell’era della sua colonizzazione. I rischi del Metaverso”, in Im@go: A Journal of the Social Imaginary, vol. 19: 195–209
Criado J. I., Gil Garcia, J. R. (2019), “Creating public value through smart technologies and strategies: From digital services to artificial intelligence and beyond”, in International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2019-0178.
Chui M., Harryson M., Manyika J., Roberts R., Chung R., van Heteren A., Nel P. (2018). Notes from the AI frontier: Applying AI for social good, McKinsey Global Institute
Cingolani M., Scendoni R., Fedeli P., Cembrani F. (2023), Artificial intelligence and digital medicine for integrated home care services in Italy: Opportunities and limits, Front Public Health. 2023, 10:1095001
D'Albergo E., Fasciani T., Giovanelli G. (2022), The urban governance of AI: policies and practices of the italian municipalities, Midterm Conference ESA Political Sociology 2022
de Certeau M. (1980), L’Invention du quotidien. Vol. 1, Arts de Faire, Union générale d'éditions
de Sousa W.G., Pereira de Melo E.R., De Souza Bermejo P.H., Araújo Sousa Farias R., Oliveira Gomes A. (2019), How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, n. 4, 101392
Di Blasi S. (2013), “Cornelius Castoriadis. L’Istituzione Immaginaria della Società”, in Im@go: A Journal of the Social Imaginary, vol. 2
Dughiero F., Michieli A., Spiller E., Testa D. (2021), Governing with urban big data in the smart city environment: an italian perspective, IUS PUBLICUM, vol. 1: 1-45
European Commission (2018), Artificial Intelligence for Europe, European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2019), Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2020a), A European Strategy for Data, European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2020b), White Paper on Artificial Intelligence - A European Approach to Excellence and Trust, European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2021a), Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence 2021 Review. Technical report, European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2021b), Fostering a European approach to Artificial Intelligence, European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2021c), Impact Assessment, European Commission, Brussels
European Commission (2021d), REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL LAYING DOWN HARMONISED RULES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACT) AND AMENDING CERTAIN UNION LEGISLATIVE ACTS, European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission (2022), Digital Economy and Society Index, European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission (2024), Communication on boosting Startups and Innovation in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence, European Commission, Brussels
Fabbri L., De Santi M. (2018), The Designers Italia project - building the community of public services designers, ServDes2018 - Service Design Proof of Concept
Fanni R., Giancotti F. (2023), Ethical Artificial Intelligence in the Italian Defence: a Case Study, DISO vol. 2, n. 29
Fatima S., Desouza K.C., & Dawson G.S. (2020), National strategic artificial intelligence plans: A multi-dimensional analysis, Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 67: 178-194
Federici S. et al. (2021), A Chatbot Solution for eGLU-Box Pro: The Usability Evaluation Platform for Italian Public Administrations, Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Methods and Tools. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12762. Springer, Cham
Forum PA (2024), Intelligenza artificiale e PA: l’opinione dei dipendenti pubblici, https://tinyurl.com/mtvfexxj
Gahnberg G. (2021), “What rules? Framing the governance of artificial agency”, Policy and Society, vol. 40, n. 2: 194–210
Galetta D.U. (2023a), Automation and Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems in the Italian Public Administration, CERIDAP, vol. 1: 13-23
Galetta D.U. (2023b), Digital Transition of Public Administration in Italy and the Right to a Good Administration: Problems and Prospects also in the Perspective of the Implementation of Italy’s Recovery and Resilience Plan, Public Law in a Troubled Era, vol. 115: 431-453
Gesk T.S., Leyer M. (2022), Artificial intelligence in public services: When and why citizens accept its usage, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, n. 3, 101704
Hewitt S. (2009). “Discourse Analysis and Public Policy Research”, in Centre for Rural
Economy Discussion Paper Series No. 24. Centre for Rural Economy, Newcastle,
UK
Ingrams, A., Kaufmann, W., & Jacobs, D. (2021). In “AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making”, Policy & Internet, 14, 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.276
Interaction Design Foundation - IxDF (2021), What is Human-Centered Design (HCD)?, Interaction Design Foundation - IxDF
Ishengoma F.R., Shao D., Alexopoulos C., Saxena S. and Nikiforova A. (2022), “Integration of artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) in the public sector: drivers, barriers and future research agenda”, in Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, vol. 24, n. 5: 449-462
Jorge Ricart R., Rossetti F., Tangi L. (2022), “AI Watch, National Strategies on Artificial Intelligence: a European Perspective”, Publications Office of the European Union, European Commission, Joint Research Centre
Khanal S., Zhang H., Taeihagh A. (2024), “Why and how is the power of Big Tech increasing in the policy process? The case of generative AI”, Policy and Society.
Haesevoets T., Verschuere B., Van Severen R., Roets A. (2024), “How do citizens perceive the use of Artificial Intelligence in public sector decisions?”, in Government Information Quarterly, vol. 41, n. 1, 101906
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017), “Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough?”, in Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608.
Leighton A. (2019), “Public administration, public leadership and the construction of public value in the age of the algorithm and ‘big data’”, in Public Administration, vol. 97, n.2: 296-310
Loukis E.N., Maragoudakis M. and Kyriakou N. (2020), “Artificial intelligence-based public sector data analytics for economic crisis policymaking”, in Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 14 n. 4:639-662
Lovari A., Ducci G. (2022), Comunicazione Pubblica. Istituzioni, pratiche, piattaforme, Milano, Mondadori.
Lupton D. (2018). “Towards Design Sociology”, Sociology Compass, vol. 12, n.1: 1-11
Manzoni M., Medaglia R., Tangi L., van Noordt C., Vaccari L., Gattwinkel D. (2022), AI Watch Road to the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence by the Public Sector: A Handbook for Policymakers, Public Administrations and Relevant Stakeholders, (No. JRC129100), Joint Research Centre
Maria Cati, M. (2024). The digitization process in the Italian Public Administration: future challenges. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1003909.
McDonald III B. D., Hall J., O'Flynn J., Thiel S. V. (2022), “The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective”, in Public Administration, vol. 100, n.1: 59-71.
Mergel I., Kattel R., Lember V., McBride K. (2018), “Citizen-oriented digital transformation in the public sector”, in Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on digital government research: Governance in the data age, 1-3.
Miller J.G. (1978), Living Systems, New York, Mc Graw-Hill.
Miller S.M., Song M., Keiser L.R. (2022), “The effect of human versus automated interaction on willingness to participate in government programs: The role of representation”, Public Administration, vol. 101, n.4: 1349-1366.
Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (2019), Proposte per una Strategia italiana per l'Intelligenza Artificiale.
Ministero per l’Innovazione Tecnologica e la Digitalizzazione (2022), Programma strategico Intelligenza Artificiale 2022-2024.
Nzobonimpa S. (2023), “Artificial intelligence, task complexity and uncertainty: analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of using algorithms in public service delivery under public administration theories”, in Digital Transformation and Society, vol. 2 n. 3: 219-234.
Opromolla A., Parisi L., De Matteis G., Pizolli R., Trodini L. (2024), “Innovare i servizi pubblici attraverso l’intelligenza artificiale. Scenari emergenti tra adolescenti e giovani adulti”, Mediascapes (under second stage of review).
Radu R. (2021), “Steering the governance of artificial intelligence: national strategies in perspective”, Policy and Society, vol. 40, n. 2, June 2021: 178–193.
Raffiotta E. (2022), L’erompere dell’intelligenza artificiale per lo sviluppo della pubblica amministrazione e dei servizi al cittadino, AI ANTHOLOGY - Profili giuridici, economici e sociali dell’intelligenza artificiale, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Rice D., Siddiki S., Frey S., Kwon J.H., Sawyer A. (2020), “Machine coding of policy texts with the Institutional Grammar”, in Public Administration, Vol. 99, n. 2: 248-262
Russel S., Norvig P. (2021), Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Global Edition, Pearson Education Limited.
Ricoeur P. (2000), La mémoire, l'histoire, l'oubli, Paris, Le Seuil.
Qian Sun T., Medaglia R. (2019), “Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare”, in Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, n. 2:368-383
Salah M., Abdelfattah F., & Al Halbusi H. (2023), “Generative Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT & Bard) in Public Administration Research: A Double-Edged Sword for Street-Level Bureaucracy Studies”, in International Journal of Public Administration, 1–7.
Sariyer G., Mangla S.K., Sozen M.E., Li G., Kazancoglu Y. (2024), “Leveraging explainable artificial intelligence in understanding public transportation usage rates for sustainable development”, in Omega, vol. 127, 103105.
Schiff D. (2021), “Assessing public value failure in government adoption of artificial intelligence”, Public Administration, vol. 100, n. 3: 653-673.
Tangi L., van Noordt C., Combetto M., Gattwinkel D., & Pignatelli, F. (2022), AI Watch.
European Landscape on the Use of Artificial Intelligence by the Public Sector (No.
JRC129301), Joint Research Centre.
van Noordt C. & Misuraca G. (2022), “Artificial Intelligence for the Public Sector: Results of Landscaping the Use of AI in Government across the European Union”, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, n.3: 101714.
Vinuesa R., Azizpour H., Leite I. et al. “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals”, Nature Communication, vol. 11, n. 233.
Wirtz B. W., Langer P. F., & Fenner C. (2021), “Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector - a Research Agenda”, International Journal of Public Administration, vol.44, n.13: 1103–1128
Wirtz B. W., Weyerer J. C., Geyer, C. (2019), “Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges”, International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 42, n. 7: 596-615
Wirtz B. W., Weyerer J. C., & Sturm, B. J. (2020), “The Dark Sides of Artificial Intelligence: An Integrated AI Governance Framework for Public Administration”, International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 43, n.9:818–829
Ying Tan S., Taeihagh A. (2021), “Governing the adoption of robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care in Singapore”, in Policy and Society, vol. 40, n. 2: 211–231
Zuiderwijk A., Chen Y. C., Salem, F. (2021), “Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Governance: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda, in Government Information Quarterly, vol. 38, n.3: 101577
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7413/2281813819594
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary - Biannual - Edizioni Mimesis