Immaginario Black Box: prospettive mitiche e critiche tra innovazione bellica ed esplorazione artistica
Abstract
Black Box Imaginary: Mythical and Critical Perspectives Between Military Innovation and Artistic Exploration
Within the imaginaries of AI, automation occupies a central position and receives varying nuanced connotations. In both technical-scientific and popular discourses, this notion takes on the rhetorical and visually metaphorical form of the black box, implying the inability to fully visualize and understand what happens inside AI systems due to a complex and intricate layering of neural networks and algorithms. The rhetoric of the black box shapes both the justification and the critique of the use of AI, by showing or obscuring implications regarding accountability, values, and ethics. The present contribution explores how the myth of the black box and various corresponding imaginaries manifest across diverse case studies in two distinct domains, revealing their political, social, and semiotic implications. Through the analysis of the representation of AI by military websites (such as Palantir and Gospel) and of artworks on AI (like Paglen’s 2019 and Akten’s 2019 works), this paper endeavors to showcase how contrasting perspectives – mythical and critical – characterize the metaphor of the black box within the imaginary of AI.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Italiano)References
Akten M. (2021), Deep Visual Instruments: Realtime Continuous, Meaningful Human Control over Deep Neural Networks for Creative Expression, Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London [Thesis],
https://doi.org/10.25602/GOLD.00030191.
Akten M., Fiebrink R., Grierson M. (2019), “Learning to see: you are what you see”, in ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Art Gallery (SIGGRAPH '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306211.3320143.
Alexander J.C. (2008), “Iconic consciousness: the material feeling of meaning”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, pp. 782-794.
Arnold T., Tilton L. (2021), “Depth in Deep Learning: Knowledge, Layered, Impenetrable”, in Redrobe K., Scheible J. (ed.) Deep Mediations, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 309-329.
Ashby R. W. (1957), An Introduction to Cybernetics, London, Chapman&Hall LTD.
Audry S. (2021), Art in the Age of Machine Learning, London & Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press.
Barale A. (2020), Arte e Intelligenza Artificiale. Be my GAN, Milano, Jaca Book.
Barthes R. (1957), Mythologies, Seuil, Paris, (trad. it. Miti d’oggi, Torino, Einaudi, 1974).
Berger J. (1972), Ways of seeing, London, Penguin Books Ltd.
Bory S. e Bory P. (2015), “I nuovi immaginari dell’Intelligenza Artificiale”, Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary, n. 6, pp. 66–85, doi: https://doi.org/10.7413/22818138047
Burrel J. (2016), “How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms”, Big Data & Society, 3(1), pp. 1–12,
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512.
Castoriadis C. (1975), L'institution imaginaire de la société II. L'imaginaire social et l'institution, Paris, Editions du Seuil (trad. it. L’istituzione immaginaria della società., Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 1995).
Cave S., Dihal K (2020), “The Whiteness of AI”, Philosophy & Technology, 33:685–703, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00415-6.
Cave S., Dihal K. (ed.) (2023), Imaging AI. How the World Sees Intelligent Machines, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Cave S., Dihal K., Dillon S. (ed.) (2020), AI Narratives. A History of Imaginative Thinking about Intelligent Machines, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Chabert J. (ed.) (1999), A History of Algorithms: From the Pebble to the Microchip. Berlin, Springer.
Chamayou G. (2013), Théorie du drone, Paris, La Fabrique Éditions.
Chun W. H. K. (2011), Programmed Visions: Software and Memory, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press.
Crawford K. (2021), Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence, New Haven & London, Yale University Press (trad. it. Né intelligente, né artificiale. Il lato oscuro dell’IA, Bologna, Il Mulino).
Crawford K., Annany M. (2018), “Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability”, new media & society, 20(3), pp. 973-989, https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481667664.
Crawford K., Paglen, T. (2021), “Excavating AI: The Politics of Images in Machine Learning Training Sets”, AI & Society, 36:1105–1116, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01162-8.
Daston L. (2022), Rules. A Short Story of What We Live By, Princeton & Oxford, Princeton University Press.
De Seta G. (2023), “Digital Depth: A Volumetric Speculation”, magazén, 4(2), pp. 245-270, doi:10.30687/mag/2724-3923/2023/02/004.
Della Ratta D. (2024), “Killing intelligence: death by tech and other ordinary horrors in Gaza”, Untoldmag, consultato il 25 aprile da: https://untoldmag.org/killing-intelligence-death-by-tech-and-other-ordinary-horrors-in-gaza/
Eco U. (1964), Apocalittici e integrati: comunicazioni di massa e teorie della cultura di massa, Milano, Bompiani.
Eco U. (1975), Trattato di semiotica generale, Firenze, Giunti editore.
Eugeni C. (2021), Capitale algoritmico. Cinque dispositivi postmediali (più uno), Brescia, Scholé.
Ferraro G. (2011), “Dinamiche dell’immaginario: una prospettiva semiotica”, in Leone M. (ed.) Immaginario, Lexia 07-08, Roma, Aracne editore, pp. 91-102.
Ferraro G. (2023), “Kito e realtà dell’IA: uno sguardo semiotico”, in Leone M. e Santangelo A. (ed.), Semiotica e intelligenza artificiale, Lexia 48, Roma, Aracne editore, pp. 65-90.
Friedenberg J. & Silverman G. (2012), Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of Mind. Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications.
Gershorn D. (2017), “The data that transformed AI research – and possibly the world”, Quartz. Consultato il giorno 5 maggio da: https://qz.com/1034972/the-data-that-changed-the-direction-of-ai-research-and-possibly-the-world.
Gigerenzer G. (2019). “How to Explain Behavior?”, Topics in Cognitive Science, 12:4, pp. 1363-1381, https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12480.
Gillespie T. (2014), “The Relevance of Algorithms” in Gillespie T., Boczkowski P., Foot K. (ed.) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society , Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, pp. 167-193.
Galison P. (1994), “The Ontology of the Enemy: Nobert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision”, Critical Inquiry, 21, pp. 228-266.
Galison P., Daston L. (2007), Objectivity, New York, Zone Books.
Grba D. (2022), “Deep Else: A Critical Framework for AI Art”, Digital, 2, pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ digital2010001
Grba D. (2024), “The Mechanical Turkness: Tactical Media Art and the Critique of Corporate AI”, arXiv, arXiv:2402.17490v1.
Hayles K. N. (2024), “Detoxifying Cybernetics: From Homeostasis to Autopoiesis and Beyond”, in Yuk Hui (eds.), Cybernetics for the 21st Century. Vol. 1: Epistemological Reconstruction, Hong Kong, Hanart Press, pp. 85-100.
Hepp A. (2020), Deep Mediatization, London, Routledge.
Jasanoff S., Kim S. H. (2015), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Knuth D. (1997), The Art of Programming. Vol. 1 Fundamental Algorithms, 3rd Edition, Boston, Addison-Wesley.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. (1981), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Latour B. (1999), Pandora’s Hope. Essays On the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge & London, The MIT Press.
Leone M. (2023), “I compiti principali di una semiotica dell’intelligenza artificiale”, in Leone M. e Santangelo A (ed.). Semiotica e intelligenza artificiale, Lexia 48, Roma, Aracne editore, pp. 29-44.
Leone M. (2024), “Semiotics of the black box: on the rhetoric of algorithmic images”, Visual Communication, 23(3), pp. 426-45, https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572241247120.
Lorusso A. M. (2011), “A Semiotic Approach to the Category of Imaginary”, in Leone M. (ed.) Immaginario, Lexia 07-08, Roma, Aracne editore, pp. 113-124.
Malavasi L. (2017), “Nella terra degli algoritmi e dei big data: incursioni artistiche nell’invisibile”, piano B. Arti e culture visive, vol. 2 n. 2, pp. 68-86, doi: 10.6092/issn.2531-9876/7962.
Marin L. (1994), De la représentation, Paris, Éditions Seuil.
McCulloch W. S., Pitts W. (1943), “A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity”, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 5, pp. 115-133, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259.
Mitchell W. J. T. (2002), “Showing Seeing: A Critique of Visual Culture”, Journal of Visual Culture, 1(2):165-181, doi:10.1177/147041290200100202.
Munn L. (2022), Automation Is a Myth, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Natale S. (2022), Macchine ingannevoli. Comunicazione, tecnologia, intelligenza artificiale. Torino, Einaudi.
Norbert W. (1961), Cybernetics; or, Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, 2nd ed., New York, The MIT Press.
Paglen T. (2016), “Invisible Images (Your Pictures Are Looking at You)”, The New Inquiry, 8 dicembre, 2016. Consultato il giorno 5 maggio da: https://thenewinquiry.com/invisible-images-your-pictures-are-looking-at-you/.
Paglen T., Downey A. (2020), “Algorithmic anxieties: Trevor Paglen in conversation with Anthony Downey”, Digi War, 1, pp. 18-28, https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-020-00001-2.
Paolucci C. (2010), Strutturalismo e Interpretazione, Milano, Bompiani.
Paolucci C. (2020), Persona. Soggettività nel linguaggio e semiotica dell’enunciazione. Milano, Bompiani.
Paolucci C. (2021), Cognitive semiotics. Integrating Signs, Minds, Meaning and Cognition, New York, Springer.
Pasquale F. (2015), The Black Box Society. The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information,Harvard University Press.
Pasquinelli M. (2023), The Eye of the Master: A Social History of Artificial Intelligence, London & New York, Verso Books.
Pasquinelli M., Joler V. (2021), “The Nooscope manifested: AI as instrument of knowledge extractivism”, AI & Society, 36(4), pp. 1263–1280, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01097-6
Pavan M. (2022), “La creazione immaginaria. L'elemento immaginario di Cornelius Castoriadis.” Rivista online Fatamorgana. Consultato il 27 aprile da: https://www.fatamorganaweb.it/lelemento-immaginario-di-cornelius-castoriadis/
Pedrazzi R. (2021), Futuri possibili. Scenari d’arte e intelligenza artificiale, Milano, Jaca Book.
Petrick E. R. (2020), “Building the Black Box: Cyberneticians and Complex Systems”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(4), pp. 575-595, https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919881212.
Ponzo J. e Stano S. (2023), “Introduzione”, in Ponzo J. e Stano,S. (ed.) Nuovi media. Nuovi miti. Lexia 49, Roma, Aracne editore, pp. 11-20.
Rancière J. (2008), Le spectateur émancipé, Paris, La Fabrique éditions.
Roberge J., Seyfert R. (ed.) (2016), Algorithmic Cultures. Essays on Meaning, Performance and New Technologies, Abingdon & New York, Routledge.
Ruiz C (2019), “Leading online database to remove 600,000 images after art project reveals its racist bias”, The Art Newspaper. Consultato il 5 maggio da: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2019/09/23/leading-online-database-to-remove-600000-images-after-art-project-reveals-its-racist-bias.
Santangelo A. (2023), “Essere umani al tempo dell’intelligenza artificiale. Narrazioni a confronto.”, in Leone M. e Santangelo A. (ed.), Semiotica e intelligenza artificiale, Lexia 48, Roma, Aracne editore, pp. 239-266.
Stano S. (2023), “Ripensare l’ideologia: un’introduzione.”, in Leone M. e Stano S. (ed.) Ideologia, Lexia 41-42, Roma, Aracne editore, pp. 9-18.
Sterling T., and van den Berg S. (2023), “Ukraine war shows urgency of military AI, Palantir CEO says”, Reuters, consultato il 25 aprile da: https://www.reuters.com/technology/ukraine-war-shows-urgency-military-ai-palantir-ceo-says-2023-02-15/
Tilak S., Glassman M., Kuznetcova I., Pelfrey L. (2022), “Applications of cybernetics to psychological theory: Historical and conceptual explorations”, Theory & Psychology, 32(2), pp. 298–325, https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354321105380.
Trione V. (2022), Artivismo: arte, politica, impegno, Torino, Einaudi.
Volli U. (2011), “L’immaginario delle origini”, in Leone M. (ed.) Immaginario, Lexia 07-08, Roma, Aracne editore, pp. 31-62.
Von Hilgers P. (2011), “The History of the Black Box: The Clash of a Thing and its Concept”, Cultural Politics, 7(1), pp. 41-58.
Voto C. (2022), “From archive to dataset. Visualizing the latency of big data”, Punctum. International Journal of Semiotics, 08(01), pp. 47–62.
Wasielewski A. (2023), Computational Formalism. Art History and Machine Learning, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press.
Zeilinger M. (2021), Tactical entanglements. AI Art, Creative Agency, and the Limits of Intellectual Property, Lüneburg, meson press.
Zylinska J. (2020), AI Art: Machine Visions and Warped Dreams, London, Open Humanities Press.
Sitography
Future of Life Institute (2023) “Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter”, FLI Open Letters, 23 marzo. Consultato il 5 maggio da: https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/.
Palantir, sito ufficiale, sezione “defense”, consultato il 25 aprile da:
https://www.palantir.com/offerings/defense/.
IDF, pagina web dedicata alla presentazione del software Gospel, consultato il 25 aprile da: https.//www.idf.il.
Barbican, “Trevor Paglen: On ‘From Apple to Anomaly’”. Consultato il 5 maggio da: https://sites.barbican.org.uk/trevorpaglen/.
Paglen T., “Imagenet Roulette”. Consultato il 5 maggio da:
https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/2019/ImageNet-Roulette-cambridge-2017.html.
Akten M., “Learning to See (series)”. Consultato il 5 maggio da:
https://www.memo.tv/works/learning-to-see/.
Barbican, “AI: More Than Human”, Press Release. Consultato il 5 maggio da: https://www.barbican.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/2019-07/FINAL%20AI%20More%20than%20Human%20exhibition%20release%20280219.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7413/2281813819599
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary - Biannual - Edizioni Mimesis