Thematic Apperception Test: an original proposal for interaction analysis
Abstract
The TAT as projective technique gives the opportunity to explore the inner world and the intra-psychic functioning, as well as the objectual representations and the prevailing thinking processes. Our hypothesis is that the TAT could also be deployed as a valid tool in the analysis of inter-personal functioning, specifically within the couple. From this assumption originates our proposal for an original methodology of TAT deployment and reading, which integrates the classical individual TAT methodology with the Common Rorschach method suggested by Willi. The goal is to experiment a parallel utilisation of the test that could contribute to the understanding of personalities and of how these intertwine in couple interaction. “In the relationship with the partner, the personality takes new shapes, given personality and character traits are strengthened, while others lose importance”, (Theodore Lidz, in Willi, 1990). The couple TAT presupposes a sequence of pictures proposed following procedures identical to the Common Rorschach ones to the single individuals at first and then to the couple. From the initial individual task follows the one of building a commonly shared history starting from the stimulus. The suggested methodology shall be exemplified through the presentation of clinical cases belonging to the research sample. The comprehension of the inter-personal dynamic, in a common task, could allow to explore the ways in which conflict expresses itself, the roles and prospects for collaboration, the “generativity” of the couple and the management of affects and anxieties in the interaction and could be successfully deployed as a tool in the context of couple counselling.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brelet, F. (1986). Il TAT. Fantasma e Situazione Proiettiva. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1994.
Brelet, F. & Chabert, C. (2005). Nouveau manuel du TAT: approche psychanalytique, Paris: DUNOD 2e Édition.
Chabert, C. (1998). Psicoanalisi e metodi proiettivi. Firenze: Borla, 2006.
Cigoli, V. & Tamanza, G. (1998). Come valutare la terapia familiare? Una proposta teorico-metodologica. In S. Di Nuovo, G. Lo Verso, M. Di Blasi, F. Giannone (Ed.), Valutare le psicoterapie (pp. 111-125). Milano: Franco Angeli.
Cuffaro, M. (1998). Il TAT nella diagnosi psicologica e clinica. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Fioravanti, M., Carlone, O., Bonello, M. (2008). Modello Relazionale nella interpretazione del Test di Appercezione Tematica, TAT: analisi della struttura e delle modalità di descrizione. Roma: Nuova Cultura.
Gandino, G. (2014). Il Rorschach di coppia. Analisi delle interazioni a due fra tradizione e nuove proposte. Torino: Utet.
Imbasciati, A. & Ghilardi, A. (1998). Manuale Clinico del TAT: la diagnosi psicoanalitica. Firenze: Giunti.
Murray, H. (1992). T.A.T. test di appercezione tematica: manuale”. Firenze: O.S.
Rapaport, D., Gill, M., Schafer, R. (1985). Reattivi Psicodiagnostici. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Shentoub, V. (1995). Manuale di Utilizzo del TAT. Un approccio psicoanalitico. Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore.
Vica Shentoub: une approche psychanalytique du TAT. Psychologie clinique et projective, Soc. du Rorschach et des Méthodes Projectives de Langue Française, vol. 8.
Willi, J. (1969). Joint Rorschach Testing of Partner Relationship. Family Process, vol. 8, 64-78.
Willi, J. (1978). Il Rorschach comune. Diagnostica delle relazioni di coppia e di gruppo. Padova: Piccin Editore.
Willi, J. (1990). La collusione di coppia. Milano: Franco Angeli.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2015.3.1109
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.