Telepsychology: Acceptability of online assessment and treatment in users and professional psychologists

Santo F. Di Nuovo, Valeria Narzisi

Abstract


Background: The article deals with issues related to telepsychology, i.e. assessment and treatment interventions using online tools. Historical stages of the assessment and treatment at distance are described, citing methods and instruments and the empirical evidence on their feasibility and validity.


Methods: The study regarded the acceptance of remote intervention by two samples of professional clinical psychologists (n = 100) and potential users (n = 200). An online survey was used, including attitudes questionnaires, the UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) model, a Semantic Differential, and the Big Five Inventory (only for users).


Results: The professionals appear more convinced than users that the online assessment and therapy intervention is useful and can be spread more. With regard to tests, they suppose greater difficulties for the responders than the users themselves perceive. At the same time, the psychologists think that diagnostic tools should be adapted to be applied online, so specific training is needed to effectively use assessment and clinical support in telematic mode.


Conclusions: The study confirms the trust of both psychologists and potential users towards online testing and interventions. Specific tools are needed to carry out the psychological intervention at distance, and specific training should be assured of psychologists who intend to use it.


Keywords


Telepsychology; Online assessment; Professional psychology; Acceptability of technologies.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbott, J-A., Klein. B., & Ciechomski, L. (2008). Best practices in online therapy, Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26(2-4): 360-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228830802097257

American Psychological Association (2013). Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. American Psychologist, 68(9): 791–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035001

American Psychological Association (2021). Psychology and the Post-Pandemic Workplace. Washington: APA.

Andersson, G., Titov, N., Dear, B.F., Rozental, A., & Carlbring, P. (2019). Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation. World Psychiatry, 18: 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20610

Backhaus, A., Agha, Z., Maglione, M.L., Repp, A., Ross, B., Zuest, D. et al. (2012) Videoconferencing Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review, Psychological Services, 9(2): 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027924

Békés, V., & Aafjes-van Doorn, K. (2020). Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(2): 238-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000214

Boldrini, T., Schiano Lomoriello, A., Del Corno, F., Lingiardi, V., Salcuni, S. (2020). Psychotherapy during COVID-19: How the clinical practice of Italian psychotherapists changed during the pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 591170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591170

Bolton, A., Dorstyn, D. (2015). Telepsychology for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 21(5): 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1357633X15571996

Buchanan, T. (2002). Online assessment: Desirable or dangerous? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2): 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.33.2.148

Cipolletta, S., Frassoni, E., & Faccio, E. (2018). Construing a therapeutic relationship online: An analysis of videoconference sessions. Clinical Psychologist, 22(2) : 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12117

De Bitencourt Machado, D., Braga Laskoski, P., Trelles Severo, C., Bassols, A.M., Sfoggia, A., Kowacs, C., et al. (2016). A Psychodynamic Perspective on a Systematic Review of Online Psychotherapy for Adults, British Journal of Psychotherapy, 32(1): 79-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12204

Farmer, R. L., McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., McClain, M. B., Harris, B., Lockwood, A. B., et al. (2020). Teleassessment with children and adolescents during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and beyond: Practice and policy implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(5): 477-487. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000349

Giromini, L., Pignolo, C., Young, G., Drogin, E.Y., Zennaro, A., & Viglione, D.J. (2021). Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29. Psychological Injury and Law 14: 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09406-0

Guido G., Peluso, A.M., Capestro, M., & Miglietta, M. (2015) An Italian version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory: An application to hedonic and utilitarian shopping values. Personality and Individual Differences. 76: 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.053

Inman, A. G., Soheilian, S. S., & Luu, L. P. (2019). Telesupervision: Building bridges in a digital era. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(2): 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22722

Jordan, S. E., & Shearer, E. M. (2019). An exploration of supervision delivered via clinical video telehealth (CVT). Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(4): 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000245

Lange, A., van de Ven, J. P., Schrieken, B., & Emmelkamp, P. M., (2001). Interapy. Treatment of posttraumatic stress through the Internet: a controlled trial. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 32(2): 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7916(01)00023-4

Mallen, M., Vogel, L., & Rochlen, B. (2005), The practical aspects of online counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(6): 776-818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005278625

Manfrida, G., Albertini, V., & Eisenberg, E. (2017). Connected: recommendations and techniques in order to employ internet tools for the enhancement of online therapeutic relationships. Experiences from Italy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(4): 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9439-5

Martin, J. N., Millán, F., & Campbell, L. F. (2020). Telepsychology practice: Primer and first steps. Practice Innovations, 5(2): 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000111

Martin, P., Lizarondo, L., & Kumar, S. (2018). A systematic review of the factors that influence the quality and effectiveness of telesupervision for health professionals. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(4): 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X17698868

Nelson, E. L., & Bui, T. (2010). Rural telepsychology services for children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(5): 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20682

Osgood C., Suci G.J., & Tannenbaum P.M. (1957), The measurement of meaning, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Pierce, B.S., Perrin, P.B., Tyler, C.M., McKee, G.B., & Watson, J.D. (2021). The COVID-19 telepsychology revolution: A national study of pandemic-based changes in U.S. mental health care delivery. American Psychologist, 76(1): 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000722

Pietrabissa, G., Manzoni, A., Algeri, D., Mazzucchelli, L., Carella, A., Pagnini, F., et al. (2015). Facebook Use as Access Facilitator for Consulting Psychology. Australian Psychol. 50: 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12139

Poletti, B., Tagini, S., Brugnera, A., Parolin, L., Pievani, L., Ferrucci, R., et al. (2020) Telepsychotherapy: a leaflet for psychotherapists in the age of COVID-19. A review of the evidence, Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2020.1769557

Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring Big Five in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1): 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001

Schulze, N., Reuter, S.C., Kuchler, I., Reinke, B., Hinkelmann, L., Stöckigt, S., et. al. (2019). Differences in attitudes toward online interventions in psychiatry and psychotherapy between health care professionals and nonprofessionals: A survey. Telemedicine and E-Health, 25(10): 926–932. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0225

Simpson, S., & Reid, C.L. (2014) Therapeutic alliance in videoconferencing psychotherapy: A review. The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 22 (6): 280-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12149

Sora, B., Nieto, R., Montesano del Campo, A., & Armayones, M. (2021). Acceptance and use of telepsychology from the clients’ perspective: Questionnaire study to document perceived advantages and barriers. JMIR Mental Health, 8(10) https://doi.org/10.2196/22199

Takahashi, H., Ban M., & Asada M. (2016). Semantic Differential scale method can reveal multi-dimensional aspects of mind perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01717

Tarlow, K. R., McCord, C. E., Nelon, J. L., & Bernhard, P. A. (2020). Comparing in-person supervision and telesupervision: A multiple baseline single-case study. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30: 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000210

Théberge-Lapointe, N., Marchand, A., Langlois, F., Gosselin, P., & Watts, S. (2015). Efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural therapy administered by videoconference for generalized anxiety disorder. Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 65(1) : 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2014.10.001

Turvey, C. L., & Roberts, L. J. (2015). Recent developments in the use of online resources and mobile technologies to support mental health care. International Review of Psychiatry, 27(6): 547–557. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1087975

Venkatesh, V, Morris, M, Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3): 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Walsh, S., Kaselionyte, J., Taylor, S.J.C, Priebe, S. (2018). What might affect acceptability of online positive psychology interventions for depression: a qualitative study on patient expectations’. BMC Psychiatry,18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1812-x

Wind, T. R., Rijkeboer, M., Andersson, G., & Riper, H. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet Interventions, 20: 100317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317




DOI: https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-3261

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.