Gender differences in the interoceptive awareness: a pilot study on Italian people

Anna Re, Sonia Malvica, Chiara Lucifora, Pietro Perconti, Domenica Bruni

Abstract


Background: Bodily self-recognition requires the individual to be able to refer to himself through a reflexive representation, typically a schema or an image of one’s own body. Body ownership results from an interplay between exteroception and interoception (i.e., the ability to perceive one’s own body from the inside). It has been demonstrated that perceiving sensations inside the body could be associated with better regulation of emotions. Also, it has been reported that interoceptive awareness may be affected by gender. Therefore, this pilot study aimed to investigate gender differences in the interoceptive awareness among Italian people.


Methods: 114 Italian volunteers (57 males and 57 females) completed the 32-item Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) questionnaire to measure the multiple dimensions of interoceptive awareness.


Results: The findings showed higher scores among females than among males for the ability to notice interoceptive input and the awareness of the relationship between bodily sensations and emotional states.


Conclusions: Results suggested that women could be more inclined to notice and focus on internal cues. Also, the gender differences could be related to physical and hormonal changes that women experience during development. Future research on the relationship between gender and physiological responses (e.g., heartbeat, skin conductance) for a specific ethnographic sample is recommended.

Keywords


Bodily Self; Gender Differences; Interoception; Emotional States; MAIA.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altemus, M., Sarvaiya, N., & Neill Epperson, C. (2014). Sex differences in anxiety and depression clinical perspectives. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 35(3), 320-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.05.004

Barrett, L.F., Gross, J., Christensen, T.C., & Benvenuto, M. (2001). Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 15(6), 713-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000239

Berlucchi, G., & Aglioti, S.M. (2010). The body in the brain revisited. Experimental Brain Research, 200(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1970-7

Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784

Blanke, O., Slater, M., & Serino, A. (2015). Behavioral, neural, and computational principles of bodily self-consciousness. Neuron, 88(1), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.029

Bornemann, B., Herbert, B. M., Mehling, W. E., & Singer, T. (2015). Differential changes in self-reported aspects of interoceptive awareness through 3 months of contemplative training. Consciousness Research, 5, 1504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01504

Braun, N., Debener, S., Spychala, N., Bongartz, E., Sörös, P., Müller, H. H. O., & Philipsen, A. (2018). The Senses of Agency and Ownership: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 535. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00535

Briere, J., & Jordan, C.E. (2009). Childhood maltreatment, intervening variables, and adult psychological difficulties in women: an overview. Trauma Violence Abuse, 10(4), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009339757

Brytek-Matera, A., & Kozieł, A. (2015). The body self-awareness among women practicing fitness: A preliminary study. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46(1), 104-111. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1515/ppb-2015-0014

Brown, T.A., Berner, L.A., Jones, M.D., Reilly, E.E., Cusack, A., Anderson, L.K., Kaye, W.H., & Wierenga, C.E. (2017). Psychometric Evaluation and Norms for the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) in a Clinical Eating Disorders Sample. European Eating Disorders Review, 25(5), 411-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2532

Calì, G., Ambrosini, E., Picconi, L., Mehling, W. E., & Committeri, G. (2015). Investigating the relationship between interoceptive accuracy, interoceptive awareness, and emotional susceptibility. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01202

Cuzzolaro, M. (2018). Body Schema and Body Image: History and Controversies. In: M. Cuzzolaro & S. Fassino (Eds.), Body Image, Eating, and Weight. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90817-5_1

Craig, A.D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894

Craig, A.D. (2015). How Do You Feel? An Interoceptive Moment with Your Neurobiological Self. Princeton, New York: Princeton University Press.

Crucianelli, L., Krahé, C., Jenkinson, P.M., & Fotopoulou, A. (2018). Interoceptive ingredients of body ownership: Affective touch and cardiac awareness in the rubber hand illusion. Cortex, 104, 180-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.04.018

Damasio, A.R. (2000). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.

De Vignemont, F. (2010). Body schema and body image -- Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 669-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.022

Ehrsson, H.H., Spence, C., & Passingham, R.E. (2004). That’s my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305(5685), 875-877. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097011

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Freedman, A., Hu, H., Liu, I.T.H.C., Stewart, A.L., Adler, S., & Mehling, W.E. (2020). Similarities and Differences in Interoceptive Bodily Awareness Between US-American and Japanese Cultures: A Focus-Group Study in Bicultural Japanese Americans. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 45(2), 234-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-020-09684-4

Gallagher, S. (1986). Body image and body schema: a conceptual clarification. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7(4), 541-554. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43853233

Gallup, G.G. (1970). Chimpanzees: Self-recognition. Science, 167(3914), 86-87. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.167.3914.86

Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5

Grabauskaitė A., Baranauskas M., & Griškova-Bulanova I. (2017). Interoception and gender: What aspects should we pay attention to?, Consciousness and Cognition, 48, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.11.002

Hooven, C., Gottman, J.M., & Katz, L. (1995). Parental meta-emotion structure predicts family and child outcomes. Cognition and Emotion, 9(2-3), 229-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939508409010

Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H.H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: a dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040

Kever, A., Pollatos, O., Vermeulen, N., & Grynberg, D. (2015). Interoceptive sensitivity facilitates both antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.014

Marotta, A., Tinazzi, M., Cavedini, C., Zampini, M., & Fiorio, M. (2016). Individual Differences in the Rubber Hand Illusion Are Related to Sensory Suggestibility. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0168489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168489

Mehling, W.E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J.J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS One, 7, e48230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048230

Mehling, W.E., Acree, M., Stewart, A., Silas, J., & Jones, A. (2018). The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2). PLoS One, 13(12), e0208034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208034

Metzinger, T., Rahul, B., & Bikas, K.C. (2007). Empirical perspectives from the self-model theory of subjectivity: A brief summary with examples. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 215-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)68018-2

Meyers-Levy, J., & Loken, B. (2015). Revisiting gender differences: what we know and what lies ahead. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.06.003

Myles, L.A.M. (2022). A Brief Overview of The Development of Body Representations Across Infancy, Childhood and Adulthood. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-3462

Myles, L.A.M., & Merlo, E. M. (2021). Alexithymia and physical outcomes in psychosomatic subjects: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences, 8(1), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.22543/7674.81.P8693

Montoya, P., Schandry, R., & Müller, A. (1993). Heartbeat evoked potentials (HEP): topography and influence of cardiac awareness and focus of attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88(3), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(93)90001-6

Moriguchi, Y., Touroutoglou, A., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Sex differences in the neural correlates of affective experience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 591-600. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst030

Moseley, G.L., Olthof, N., Venema, A., Don, S., Wijers, M., Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2008). Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(35), 13169-13173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803768105

Murphy, J., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2019). Classifying individual differences in interoception: Implications for the measurement of interoceptive awareness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1467-1471. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01632-7

Parkin, L., Morgan, R., Rosselli, A., Howard, M., Sheppard, A., Evans, D., Hawkins, A., Martinelli, M., Golden, A.-M., Dalgleish, T., & Barbany, D. (2013). Exploring the Relationship Between Mindfulness and Cardiac Perception. Mindfulness, 5(3), 298-313. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s12671-012-0181-7

Pollatos, O., & Schandry, R. (2008). Emotional processing and emotional memory are modulated by interoceptive awareness. Cognition and Emotion, 22(2), 272-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701357535

Prentice, F., & Murphy, J. (2022). Sex differences in interoceptive accuracy: a meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 132, 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.030

Price, C.J., & Hooven, C. (2018). Interoceptive awareness skills for emotion regulation: Theory and approach of mindful awareness in body-oriented therapy (MABT). Frontiers in psychology, 9, 798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00798

Raimo, S., Boccia, M., Di Vita, A., Iona, T., Cropano, M., Ammendolia, A., Colao, R., Iocco, M., Angelillo, V., Guariglia, C., Grossi, D., & Palermo, L. (2020). Interoceptive awareness in focal brain-damaged patients. Neurological Sciences, 41(6), 1627–1631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04172-z

Re, A., Perconti, P., Malvica, S., & Castano, E. (2023). Did you hear your action? An ecological approach to the senses of ownership and agency. Perception, 52(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066221145197

Ring, C., & Brener, J. (2018). Heartbeat counting is unrelated to heartbeat detection: A comparison of methods to quantify interoception. Psychophysiology, 55(9), e13084. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13084

Shah, P., Hall, R., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2016). Alexithymia, not autism, is associated with impaired interoception. Cortex, 81, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.021

Schulz A., & Vögele C. (2015). Interoception and stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00993

Suzuki, N., Yamamoto, T., Uchiumi, C., & Sugaya, N. (2021). Effects of Interoceptive Sensibility on Mental Health during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094616

Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., & Ullman, J.B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Boston: Pearson.

Todd, J., Barron, D., Aspell, J.E., Toh, E.K.L., Zahari, H.S., Khatib, N.A.M., & Swami, V. (2020). Translation and validation of a Bahasa Malaysia (Malay) version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLos One, 15(4), e0231048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231048

Thompson, A.E., Voyer, D., 2014. Sex differences in the ability to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: a meta analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 28(7), 1164-1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.875889

Tsakiris, M., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., & Costantini, M. (2011). Just a heartbeat away from one’s body: Interoceptive sensitivity predicts the malleability of body-representations. Proceedings of Biological Science, 278(1717), 2470-2476. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2547

Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C., & Reyes-Reyes, A. (2015). Psychometric properties of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA) in a Chilean population. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00120

Whitaker, K.L., Scott, S.E., & Wardle, J. (2015). Applying symptom appraisal models to understand sociodemographic differences in responses to possible cancer symptoms: A research agenda. British Journal of Cancer, 112(Suppl. 1), S27–S34. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.39

Whiteford, H.A., Ferrari, A.J., Degenhardt, L., Feigin, V., & Vos, T. (2015). The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One, 10(2), e0116820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116820

Willem, C., Gandolphe, M.-C., Nandrino, J.-L., & Grynberg, D. (2021). French Translation and Validation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-Fr). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/cbs0000271




DOI: https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-3571

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.