Capacity to consent to research in older adults with normal cognitive functioning, mild and major neurocognitive disorder: an Italian study
Abstract
Background: A specific evaluation of the capacity to consent to research in older adults with cognitive decline is often not included routinely in research practice. However, there is a need to evaluate this competence adopting brief standardized instruments to guarantee their ethical rights. The present study evaluated in older adults with normal cognitive functioning, and major and mild neurocognitive disorders whether the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a brief battery of neuropsychological tests are sensitive and specific to discriminate subjects able to provide consent to research.
Methods: 54 participants with Major Neurocognitive Disorder (MajorNCD), 22 with Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (MildNCD), and 37 Normal Cognitive Functioning individuals (NCF). The capacity to provide consent was assessed using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research. Cognitive functioning was assessed using the MMSE, Verbal Fluency Tests, Trail Making Test (TMT-A), Immediate and Delayed Recall Test.
Results: In the MildNCD and NCF groups, the aggregate score of neuropsychological tests showed high sensitivity and specificity in classifying subjects able to provide consent to research. In the MajorNCD group, MMSE, Recall test, and TMT-A performed better than the aggregate score in classifying subjects as able of consenting to the hypothetical research.
Conclusion: The choice of the best tool to assess the ability to provide consent to research may depend on the degree of cognitive impairment. MMSE is a good tool for subjects with MajorNCD. A more comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests would represent a better tool in NCF and MildNCD individuals.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allegri, N., Rosi, A., Del Signore, F., Cremascoli, R., Cappa, S., Tassorelli, C., & Govoni, S. (2021). Dementia-friendly intervention for hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairments: results of the Italian Dementia-Friendly Hospital Trial (IDENTITÀ). Aging & Mental Health, 26(4), 716-724. http://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.1901261
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (2001). MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR). Professional resource press.
Bellardita, L., Villa, S., De Luca, L., Donegani, S., Magnani, T., Salvioni, R., & Valdagni, R. (2019). Treatment decision-making process of men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer: the role of multidisciplinary approach in patient engagement. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 7(1), 1-11. http://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2019.7.1997
Biros, M. (2018). Capacity, vulnerability, and informed consent for research. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(1), 72-78. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518766021
Buckles, V. D, Powlishta, K. K, Palmer, J. L, Coats, M., Hosto, T., Buckley, A., & Morris, J. C. (2003) Understanding of informed consent by demented individuals. Neurology, 61(12), 1662-1666. http://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000098933.34804.fc
Cacchione, P. Z. (2011). People with dementia: Capacity to consent to research participation. Clinical Nursing Research, 20(3), 223-227. http://doi.org/10.1177/1054773811415810
Caruso, V., Giammanco, M. D., & Gitto, L. (2014). Quality of life and uncertainty in illness for chronic patients. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2014.2.990
Coppola, E., & Mento, C. (2013). Clinical psychology and research: epistemological notes. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2013.1.900
de Medeiros, K., Girling, L. M., & Berlinger, N. (2022). Inclusion of people living with Alzheimer’s disease or related dementias who lack a study partner in social research: Ethical considerations from a qualitative evidence synthesis. Dementia, 21(4), 1200-1218. http://doi.org/10.1177/14713012211072501
Dunn, L. B., Nowrangi, M. A., Palmer, B. W., Jeste, D. V., & Saks, E. R. (2006). Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(8), 1323-1334. http://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.8.1323
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. http://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Frisone, F. (2021). Clinical psychology: what type of science?. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-3233
Galeotti, F., Vanacore, N., Gainotti, S., Izzicupo, F., Menniti-Ippolito, F., Petrini, C., Chiarotti, F., Chattat, R., & Raschetti, R. (2012). How legislation on decisional capacity can negatively affect the feasibility of clinical trials in patients with dementia. Drugs & aging, 29(8), 607-614. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262277
Gaubert, F., & Chainay, H. (2021). Decision-making competence in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A review of the literature. Neuropsychology Review, 31(2), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09472-2
Gilbert, T., Bosquet, A., Thomas-Antérion, C., Bonnefoy, M., & Le Saux, O. (2017). Assessing capacity to consent for research in cognitively impaired older patients. Clinical interventions in aging, 12, 1553. http://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S141905
Giovagnoli, A. R., Del Pesce, M., Mascheroni, S., Simoncelli, M., Laiacona, M., & Capitano, E. (1996) Trail making test: normative values from 287 normal adult controls. The Italian journal of neurological sciences, 17(4), 305-309. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01997792
Glass, K. C. (1997). Refining definitions and devising instruments: Two decades of assessing mental competence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20(1), 5-33. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(96)00020-9
Gregory, R., Roked, F., Jones, L., & Patel, A. (2007) Is the degree of cognitive impairment in patients with Alzheimer's disease related to their capacity to appoint an enduring power of attorney? Age Ageing, 36(5), 527-31. http://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afm104
Grisso, T., Appelbaum, P. S., & Hill-Fotouhi, C. (1997) The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatric Services, 48(11), 1415-1419. http://doi.org/10.1176/ps.48.11.1415
Gurrera, R. J., Moye, J., Karel, M. J., Azar, A. R., & Armesto, J. C. (2006). Cognitive performance predicts treatment decisional abilities in mild to moderate dementia. Neurology, 66(9), 1367-1372. http://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000210527.13661.d1
Hamilton, R. K., Phelan, C. H., Chin, N. A., Wyman, M. F., Lambrou, N., Cobb, N., ... & Gleason, C. E. (2020). The U-ARE protocol: A pragmatic approach to decisional capacity assessment for clinical research. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 73(2), 431-442. http://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190457
Harmell, A. L., Pinto, L. L., Kim, S. Y., Dunn, L. B., Golshan, S., Jeste, D. V., & Palmer, B. W. (2013). Evaluating Decisional Capacity in Older Adults and Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(3), S82-S83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.12.108
Ho, M. H., Chang, H. C. R., Liu, M. F., Chien, H. W., Tang, L. Y., Chan, S. Y., ... & Traynor, V. (2021). Decision-making in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: A narrative review of decision-making tools. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(10), 2056-2062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.06.034
Isella, V., Mapelli, C., Morielli, N., Pelati, O., Franceschi, M., & Appollonio, I. M. (2008) Age-related quantitative and qualitative changes in decision making ability. Behavioural Neurology,19(1-2), 59-63. http://doi.org/10.1155/2008/893727
Jefferson, A. L., Lambe, S., Moser, D. J., Byerly, L. K., Ozonoff, A., & Karlawish, J. H. (2008). Decisional capacity for research participation in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(7), 1236-1243. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01752.x
Jeste, D. V., Palmer, B. W., Appelbaum, P. S., Golshan, S., Glorioso, D., Dunn, L. B., Kim, K., Meek, T. & Kraemer, H. C. (2007). A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research. Archives of general psychiatry, 64(8), 966-974. http://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.966
Karlawish, J. H. T., Casarett, D. J., & James, B. D. (2002). Alzheimer’s disease patients’ and caregivers’ capacity, competency, and reasons to enroll in an early-phase Alzheimer’s disease clinical trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50(12), 2019-2024. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50615.x
Karlawish, J., Kim, S. Y., Knopman, D., Van Dyck, C. H., James, B. D., & Marson, D. (2008). Interpreting the clinical significance of capacity scores for informed consent in Alzheimer disease clinical trials. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16(7), 568-574. http://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e318172b406
Kim, S. Y., & Caine, E. D. (2002). Utility and limits of the mini mental state examination in evaluating consent capacity in Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatric Services, 53(10), 1322-1324. http://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.53.10.1322
Kim, S.Y., Caine, E. D., Currier, G. W., Leibovici, A., & Ryan, J. M. (2001) Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer’s disease in providing informed consent for participation in research. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(5), 712-717. http://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.5.712
Lai, J. M., & Karlawish, J. (2007). Assessing the capacity to make everyday decisions: a guide for clinicians and an agenda for future research. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry, 15(2), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JGP.0000239246.10056.2e
Marson, D. C., Hawkins, L., McInturff, B., & Harrell, L. E. (1997). Cognitive models that predict physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45(4), 458-464. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05171.x
Marson, D. C., Chatterjee, A., Ingram, K. K, & Harrell, L. E. (1996). Toward a neurologic model of competency: Cognitive predictors of capacity to consent in Alzheimer’s disease using three different legal standards. Neurology, 46(3), 666–672. http://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.46.3.666
Marson, D. C., Cody, H. A., Ingram, K. K., & Harrell, L. E. (1995). Neuropsychological predictors of competency in Alzheimer’s disease using a rational reasons legal standard. Archives of Neurology, 52(10), 955–959. http://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1995.00540340035011
Moberg, P. J., & Kniele, K. (2006). Evaluation of competency: Ethical considerations for neuropsychologists. Applied Neuropsychology, 13(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324826an1302_5
Moelter, S. T., Weintraub, D., Mace, L., Cary, M., Sullo, E., Xie, S. X., & Karlawish, J. (2016). Research consent capacity varies with executive function and memory in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders, 31(3), 414-417. http://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26469
Moro, V., Valbusa, V., Corsi, N., Bonazzi, A., Condoleo, M. T., Broggio, E., & Gambina, G. (2020). Comprehension of written texts for the assessment of clinical competence and decision making in people with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Neurological Sciences, 41(5), 1225-1231. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04228-0
Moye, J., Karel, M. J., Azar, A. R., & Gurrera, R. J. (2004). Capacity to consent to treatment: empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementia. The Gerontologist, 44(2), 166-175. http://doi.org/10.1093/geront/44.2.166
Moye, J., Marson, D. C., & Edelstein, B. (2013). Assessment of capacity in an aging society. American Psychologist, 68(3), 158. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0032159
Novelli, G., Papagno, C., Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Vallar, G., & Cappa, S. F. (1986). Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale. Taratura su soggetti normali [Three clinical tests to research and rate the lexical performance of normal subjects]. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 47, 477–506.
Palmer, B. W., Harmell, A. L., Pinto, L. L., Dunn, L. B., Kim, S. Y., Golshan, S., & Jeste, D. V. (2017). Determinants of capacity to consent to research on Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical gerontologist, 40(1), 24-34. http://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2016.1197352
Parmigiani, G., Del Casale, A., Mandarelli, G., Barchielli, B., Kotzalidis, G. D., D’Antonio, F., Di Vita, A., & Ferracuti, S. (2021). Decisional capacity to consent to treatment and research in patients affected by Mild Cognitive Impairment. A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Psychogeriatrics, 34(6), 529-542. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220004056
Passmore, M. J. (2013). Neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: consent, quality of life, and dignity. BioMed Research International, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/230134
Pesonen, H. M., Remes, A. M., & Isola, A. (2011). Ethical aspects of researching subjective experiences in early-stage dementia. Nursing Ethics, 18(5), 651-661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733011408046
Porteri, C., & Petrini, C. (2015). Research involving subjects with Alzheimer’s disease in Italy: the possible role of family members. BMC medical ethics, 16, 12. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0009-9
Raymont, V., Bingley, W., Buchanan, A., David, A. S., Hayward, P., Wessely, S., & Hotopf, M. (2004). Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 364(9443), 1421-1427. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17224-3
Ries, N. M., Mansfield, E., & Sanson-Fisher, R. (2020). Ethical and legal aspects of research involving older people with cognitive impairment: A survey of dementia researchers in Australia. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 68, 101534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101534
Sacco, G., Noublanche, F., Blazek, F., Hue, C., Carballido, L., Asfar, M., ... & Annweiler, C. (2021). How to deal with the consent of adults with cognitive impairment involved in European geriatric living labs?. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 16(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-021-00101-1
Southerland, L. T., Benson, K. K., Schoeffler, A. J., Lashutka, M. A., Borson, S., & Bischof, J. J. (2022). Inclusion of older adults and reporting of consent processes in randomized controlled trials in the emergency department: A scoping review. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, 3(4), e12774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12774
Spinnler, H. & Tognoni, G. (1987) Standardizzazione e Taratura Italiana di test neuropsicologici [Italian standardization and calibration of neuropsychological tests]. Milano: Masson Italia periodici.
Sturman, E. D. (2005). The capacity to consent to treatment and research: a review of standardized assessment tools. Clinical psychology review, 25(7), 954-974. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.04.010
Warner, J., McCarney, R., Griffin, M., Hill, K., & Fisher, P. (2008). Participation in dementia research: rates and correlates of capacity to give informed consent. Journal of medical ethics, 34(3), 167-170. http://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.019786
West, E., Stuckelberger, A., Pautex, S., Staaks, J., & Gysels, M. (2017). Operationalizing ethical challenges in dementia research—a systematic review of current evidence. Age and ageing, 46(4), 678-687. http://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw250
Whelan, P. J., Oleszek, J., Macdonald, A., & Gaughran, F. (2009). The utility of the Mini-Mental State Examination in guiding assessment of capacity to consent to research. International psychogeriatrics, 21(2), 338. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610208008314
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-3620
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.