Italian validation of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 Version 3 among teenagers admitted to the youth justice system
Abstract
Background: The Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 third version (HCR-20V3) is a semi-structured interview for the assessment of past, current, and prospective risk factors for violent behaviors. Accumulating research across various forensic and clinical populations, has found that the HCR-20V3 is a psychometrically robust measure. However, to our knowledge, there is limited data on the use of the HCR-20 among adolescents. This study sought to investigate the psychometric properties of the HCR-20V3 in an Italian teen sample.
Methods: Sixty-one male teenagers, aged between 14 and 19, admitted to the Italian juvenile justice system were involved in the study. To assess convergent validity with measures of antisocial traits and personality impairments, the associations between the HCR-20V3, the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV), and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I (SCID-5-AMPD), were examined. Known group validity was assessed by comparing participants with and without recidivism at the 6- and the 12-month follow-up.
Results: The HCR-20V3 showed good internal consistency: Cronbach’s alpha (risk presence) = .88; Cronbach’s alpha (risk relevance) .87. The split-half reliability was also good: Spearman-Brown (presence) = .92; Spearman-Brown (relevance) = .92) Convergent validity with the PCL:YV and the SCID-AMPD total score and domains were moderate-to-large in size (Pearson’s r range .34 to .83, and .49 to .69, respectively). Compared to participants who had not been reported for a new crime, those who had a recidivism at the 6- and 12-month follow-up showed higher, albeit non-significant, scores both in the presence (Mann-Whithney’s U = 133, p =.093; U = 243, p =.089, respectively) and the relevance items (U = 131, p =.083; U = 266, p =.185, respectively).
Conclusions: Results suggest that the HCR-20V3 is a suitable measure for assessing risk of violence in the juvenile justice systems. Considering the lack of tools for assessing youth violent behavior, HCR-20V3 might significantly contribute to the assessment of critical risk factors for recidivism, potential targets for interventions, and response to treatment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adjorlolo, S., & Chan, H. C. O. (2019). Risk assessment of criminal offenders in Ghana: An investigation of the discriminant validity of the HCR-20V3. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 66, 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101458
Belfrage, H. (1998). Implementing the HCR-20 scheme for risk assessment in a forensic psychiatric hospital: Integrating research and clinical practice. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 9(2), 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189808402200
Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., First, M. B., & Oldham, J. M. (2018). Module I: Structured Clinical Interview for the Level of Personality Functioning Scale. In M. B. First, A. E. Skodol, D. S. Bender, & J. M. Oldham (Eds.). Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD). American Psychiatric Association.
Biancosino, B., Delmonte, S., Grassi, L., Santone, G., Preti, A., Miglio, R., & de Girolamo, G. (2009). Violent Behavior in Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Facilities: A National Survey in Italy. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 197(10), 772-782. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181bb0d6b
Biondi, M., & Picardi, A. (2018). I nuovi “casi difficili” in psichiatria. Rivista di psichiatria, 53(5), 223-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1708/3000.30002
Bjørkly, S., Eidhammer, G., & Selmer, L. E. (2014). Concurrent Validity and Clinical Utility of the HCR-20V3 Compared With the HCR-20 in Forensic Mental Health Nursing: Similar Tools but Improved Method. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 10(4), 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1097/jfn.0000000000000047
Brookstein, D. M., Daffern, M., Ogloff, J. R. P., Campbell, R. E., & Chu, C. M. (2021). Predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 in a sample of Australian forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(3), 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1775152
Cacho, R., Fernández-Montalvo, J., López-Goñi, J. J., Arteaga, A., & Haro, B. (2020). Psychosocial and Personality Characteristics of Juvenile Offenders in a Detention Centre regarding Recidivism Risk. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 12(2), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2020a9
Caretti, V., Carpentieri, R., Caprì, C., & Schimmenti, A. (2019). Attendibilità, validità e proprietà psicometriche della versione italiana dell’HCR-20v3. In Caretti, V.. Scarpa, F., Ciappi, S.., Castelletti, R-, Catanesi, R., Carabellese, F.F […] & Schimmenti, A.. HCR-20v3. Assessing risk for violence (pp.92-116). Hogrefe.
Cawood, J. S., & Corcoran, M. H. (2019). Violence assessment and intervention: The practitioner's handbook. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429344367
Cawood, J. S. (2017). The interrater reliability and predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 in common workplace environments. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000071
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge Academic.
Cohen, M. A., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2010). Studying the costs of crime across offender trajectories. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(2), 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00627.x
de Vogel, V., van den Broek, E., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2014). The Use of the HCR-20V3in Dutch Forensic Psychiatric Practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.906518
Dickens, G. L., & O'Shea, L. E. (2017). Use of the HCR-20 for violence risk assessment: views of clinicians working in a secure inpatient mental health setting. Journal of Forensic Practice, 19(2), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-08-2016-0039
Dolan, M., & Khawaja, A. (2004). The HCR-20 and post-discharge outcome in male patients discharged from medium security in the UK. Aggressive Behavior, 30(6), 469-483. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20044
Douglas, K. S. (2014). Version 3 of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20V3): Relevance to Violence Risk Assessment and Management in Forensic Conditional Release Contexts. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(5), 557-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2134
Douglas, K. S., & Belfrage, H. (2014). Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the HCR-20 Version 3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.908429
Douglas, K. S., & Reeves, K. A. (2010). Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) Violence Risk Assessment Scheme: Rationale, application, and empirical overview. In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 147–185). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk for violence – User guide. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., Nicholls, T. L., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 917-930. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.67.6.917
Doyle, M., Power, L. A., Coid, J., Kallis, C., Ullrich, S., & Shaw, J. (2014). Predicting Post-Discharge Community Violence in England and Wales Using the HCR-20V3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.906517
Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version. Multi-Health Systems.
Fossati, A., & Somma, A. (2021). The assessment of personality pathology in adolescence from the perspective of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorder. Current Opinion in Psychology, 37, 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.015
Fujii, D., Lichton, A., & Tokioka, A. (2004). Structured professional judgment versus actuarial data in violence risk prediction using the Historical Clinical Risk Management20. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.
Hart, S. D., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. S. (2016). The Structured Professional Judgement Approach to Violence Risk Assessment. The Wiley Handbook on the Theories, Assessment and Treatment of Sexual Offending, 643-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574003.wattso030
Howe, J., Rosenfeld, B., Foellmi, M., Stern, S., & Rotter, M. (2016). Application of the HCR-20 Version 3 in Civil Psychiatric Patients. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 398-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815605527
Istat. (2021). Annuario Statistico Italiano 2021.
Kleeven, A. T. H., de Vries Robbé, M., Mulder, E. A., & Popma, A. (2023). The Validity of Violence Risk Assessment in Young Adults: A Comparative Study of Juvenile and Adult Risk Assessment Tools. Emerging Adulthood, 11(6), 1409-1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231184278
Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (2002) World Report on Violence and Health. World Health Organization.
Løvgren, P. J., Laake, P., Reitan, S. K., & Narud, K. (2022). Use of assessment instruments in forensic evaluations of criminal responsibility in Norway. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03831-4
Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4, 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573
Müller-Isberner, R., Webster, C. D., & Gretenkord, L. (2007). Measuring Progress in Hospital Order Treatment: Relationship between Levels of Security and C and R Scores of the HCR-20. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 6(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2007.10471256
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill Higher.
Pechorro, P., Quintas, J., DeLisi, M., & Gonçalves, R. A. (2021). Can the triarchic model of psychopathy predict youth offender recidivism? Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(5), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2020.1818237
Ramesh, T., Igoumenou, A., Vazquez Montes, M., & Fazel, S. (2018). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry, 52, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.007
Rossdale, S.-V., Tully, R. J., & Egan, V. (2020). The HCR-20 for Predicting Violence in Adult Females: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 20(1), 15-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2019.1681875
Sabatello, U., Abbate, L., & Spissu, M. (2012). Adattamento Italiano della: Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version, di Adelle E. Forth, David S. Kosson e Robert D. Hare. Giunti O.S.
Sabatello, U., D'Antuono, L., Iliceto, P., Stefanile, S., & Laghi, F. (2022). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Hare psychopathy checklist-youth version (PCL:YV) in a sample of adolescents with criminal convictions. Current Psychology, 41(4), 2457-2468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00765-6
Sea, J., & Bang, S. (2021). The Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the HCR-20 Version 3 in South Korea. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(6), 879-901. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2021.1937279
Shepherd, S. M., Campbell, R. E., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2018). The Utility of the HCR-20 in an Australian Sample of Forensic Psychiatric Patients. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(2), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1364676
Somma, A., Borroni, S., Gialdi, G., Carlotta, D., Emanuela Giarolli, L., Barranca, M., Cerioli, C., Franzoni, C., Masci, E., Manini, R., Luca Busso, S., Ruotolo, G., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., & Fossati, A. (2020). The Inter-Rater Reliability and Validity of the Italian Translation of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Module I and Module II: A Preliminary Report on Consecutively Admitted Psychotherapy Outpatients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 34(Supplement C), 95-123. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2020_34_511
Strub, D. S., Douglas, K. S., & Nicholls, T. L. (2014). The Validity of Version 3 of the HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme Amongst Offenders and Civil Psychiatric Patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.911785
Thamakosit, W. (2007). Validity of the HCR-20: Violence Risk Assessment Scheme (Thai version). Journal of Mental Health of Thailand, 15 (2). Retrieved March 11, 2017 from http://thailand.digitaljournals.org/index.php/JMHT/article/view/8141
United Nations (2015). General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1. Transforming Our World, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Vincent, G. M., Drawbridge, D., & Davis, M. (2019). The validity of risk assessment instruments for transition-age youth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(2), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000366
Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Gershenson, B. G., & McCabe, P. (2012). Does Risk Assessment Make a Difference? Results of Implementing the SAVRY in Juvenile Probation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30(4), 384-405. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2014
Vitacco, M. J., Tabernik, H. E., Zavodny, D., Bailey, K., & Waggoner, C. (2016). Projecting Risk: The Importance of the HCR-20 Risk Management Scale in Predicting Outcomes with Forensic Patients. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(2-3), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2221
The Jamovi project. (2021). Jamovi. (Version 2.2) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
Warren, J. I., South, S. C., Burnette, M. L., Rogers, A., Friend, R., Bale, R., & Van Patten, I. (2005). Understanding the risk factors for violence and criminality in women: The concurrent validity of the PCL-R and HCR-20. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28(3), 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2003.09.012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-4083
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.